top of page
Search

The Interplay Between Fundamental Rights, DPSPs, and Fundamental Duties: A Constitutional Triad

Introduction


The Indian Constitution is a dynamic document that balances individual freedoms (Fundamental Rights), socio-economic goals (Directive Principles of State Policy - DPSPs), and civic responsibilities (Fundamental Duties). While these three components serve different purposes, they are deeply interconnected, shaping India’s democratic and welfare-oriented framework. This blog explores their relationship, conflicts, and how they collectively strengthen constitutional governance.


1. Fundamental Rights (FRs) – The Shield of Liberty


Enshrined in: Part III (Articles 12-35)Nature: Justiciable (enforceable by courts).Purpose: Protect individual freedoms against state arbitrariness.


Key Rights Include:


  • Right to Equality (Articles 14-18)

  • Right to Freedom (Articles 19-22)

  • Right Against Exploitation (Articles 23-24)

  • Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)


Judicial Backing: Courts can strike down laws violating FRs.


2. Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) – The Path to Welfare


Enshrined in: Part IV (Articles 36-51)Nature: Non-justiciable (not enforceable by courts).Purpose: Guide the state in policymaking for social and economic justice.


Key Principles Include:


  • Equal pay for equal work (Article 39(d))

  • Free legal aid (Article 39A)

  • Environmental protection (Article 48A)

  • Uniform Civil Code (Article 44)


Judicial Role: Courts use DPSPs to interpret laws and expand FRs (e.g., Right to Education under Article 21A).


3. Fundamental Duties – The Citizen’s Responsibility


Enshrined in: Part IV-A (Article 51A) (Added by 42nd Amendment, 1976)Nature: Non-enforceable but morally binding.Purpose: Promote civic consciousness and national integrity.


Key Duties Include:


  • Respect the Constitution & National Flag (51A(a))

  • Promote harmony & renounce discrimination (51A(e))

  • Protect the environment (51A(g))

  • Develop scientific temper (51A(h))


Judicial Use: Courts refer to duties while interpreting laws (e.g., banning firecrackers for environmental protection).


The Relationship: Conflict, Harmony, and Balance


A. FRs vs. DPSPs – From Conflict to Complementarity


  • Early Conflict: Courts initially gave primacy to FRs (e.g., Champakam Dorairajan Case, 1951).

  • Harmonization: Later judgments (Kesavananda Bharati, Minerva Mills) ruled that FRs and DPSPs are complementary—neither is superior.

  • Example: Right to Education (Article 21A) evolved from DPSP Article 45.


B. DPSPs & Fundamental Duties – Policy Meets Civic Duty


  • DPSPs guide the state, while Fundamental Duties guide citizens.

  • Example: Environmental protection (DPSP Article 48A & Duty 51A(g)) led to forest conservation laws.


C. FRs & Fundamental Duties – Rights with Responsibilities


  • FRs grant freedoms, but Duties remind citizens to use them responsibly.

  • Example: Freedom of Speech (Article 19(1)(a)) is balanced by Duty 51A(h) (scientific temper), restricting hate speech.


Key Judicial Interpretations


Case

Ruling

Impact

Kesavananda Bharati (1973)

Basic Structure Doctrine – FRs & DPSPs must coexist.

Prevented absolute state power.

Minerva Mills (1980)

FRs & DPSPs are integrated; neither can be destroyed.

Strengthened welfare democracy.

MC Mehta v. Union of India (1986)

Used DPSP 48A & Duty 51A(g) for environmental rulings.

Expanded PIL jurisdiction.


Criticisms & Challenges


  1. DPSPs Remain Aspirational – Lack of enforcement leads to slow implementation.

  2. Duties Ignored – No legal penalties reduce their effectiveness.

  3. Conflict Areas – E.g., Uniform Civil Code (Article 44) vs. Religious Freedom (Article 25).


Conclusion: Towards a Balanced Constitutional Order


The Fundamental Rights-DPSPs-Duties triad reflects India’s constitutional vision:


  • Rights protect liberty,

  • DPSPs ensure equity,

  • Duties foster responsibility.


While tensions exist, judicial wisdom has harmonized them, ensuring rights are not absolute, welfare is not neglected, and citizenship is not passive. The challenge lies in political will and public awareness to fully realize this balance.


Do you think Fundamental Duties should be made enforceable? Should DPSPs get stronger judicial backing? Share your views!


Commentaires

bottom of page